THE RIGHTS OF OUR
ANIMAL BRETHREN
JUSTICE V.R.KRISHNA
IYER
“From an early age, I have adjured the use of
meat, and the time will come when men look upon the murder of animals as
they look upon the murder of men.” -Leonardo Da Vinci.
An issue of fundamental significance and universal
relevance needs to be brought into the consciousness of the world community.
Ecology and environment, life in every form and evolution, have certain
harmony and
intergrality that makes all creation kin. Spiritually speaking,
the quintessence of the environmental movement, in its widest sweep, is that
everything belongs to the supreme self and performs its karma with a
functional nexus. In practical terms, there is a purpose for everything in
Nature too sacred to be destroyed. Eknath Easwaran has exquisitely expressed
this idea which I may excerpt here.
“Nobody has any right to pollute the air, water, or
seas, to cut down forests, or to wash away the topsoil. We do not own the
earth. We are just transients who have been entrusted to leave the earth a
little better than we found it. This is everybody’s job; nobody is exempt
from it and, in this sense, nobody is unemployed.”
“It follows that our environment crisis demands that
every one of us play a useful part, in our own way, to improve the
environment wherever we live. If a person fails to do that, even if he wins
a prestigious prize, the Buddha would say, you haven’t done what you have to
do.”
“When you have done what you have to do, you will feel
very secure, very fulfilled. As you discover the self in your own heart, you
discover it simultaneously everywhere, in the people and creatures around
you. You will feel very much at home in this universe. You don’t need to
take my word for it. Try it and see for your self ”. (“Your life is your
message” by
Eknath Easwaran, Nilgiri Press, USA-p 92-93)
Ahimsa of Gandhi or “love thy neighbour” of Jesus proceed on the basic law
of our being, the truth of our nature and our innate dignity. This a Davidic
vision is the soul of our cultural heritage: and when we meditate with this unitive understanding, the mountains, the oceans , the forests and all
living forms and inorganic things look divine. God (or call Him by whatever
name you like) sleeps in the mineral, wakes in the vegetable, walks in the
animal, thinks in man and reaches realization when the human ascent and the
divine descent meet. If we are able to gain this vistaramic perspective,
peace on earth becomes an easy essay to achieve. In the words of Adlai
Stevenson, the human race is a family: men are brothers: all wars are civil
wars. Such a holistic perception, makes the whole world kin and promotes
anew order alive with a sublime presence.
The
U.N.Conference on Environment and Development and
the Declaration made at Rio de Janeiro emanate from these spiritual depths.
The order of Nature is it self a manifestation of this conceptual
globalization. The time has come for the nations and peoples everywhere to
adopt the order of Nature as the cornerstone of the New World Human Order.
The philosophy of the Order may be tersely expressed
thus:
Nature is made up of an inanimate terrestrial, aerial
and aquatic ensemble, on the one hand an animate vegetable, animal and human
habitat, on the other hand.
The human species must consider itself an element of
the terrestrial habitat and must respect co-existence and symbiosis. Any
failure to respect these is an attack on nature, prejudicial to the whole
ensemble of inanimate and animate beings.
‘The actions to be rewarded concern, in particular, the
safeguarding of the natural environment, the struggle against genocidal
pollution, the safeguarding of the vegetable and animal species, animal
protection, the teaching of the relations between humans and nonhumans, the
fight against
speciesism and more generally, all actions tending to render
efficient the Universal Declaration of the Rights of Animals, the Universal
Declaration of the Rights of Plants and the Universal Declaration of the
Rights of Nature which is drafted by Prof. Georges Heuse. The declarations
and the order of Nature will stimulate the perception of the cosmic integral
Unity in human species.
There is no international nor national order comparable
to the Order of Nature; the existing orders regard human beings as humans,
and not as members of the community of Nature. The Order of Nature will be
considered as the first supranational Order and the first planetary model.’
This
vedic vision of the Indian seers of ancient
vintage is our proud heritage. The radiant of this world of harmony and
non-violence must persuade all humanity to adopt what Prof. Heuse, President
of the World Foundation of Quality of Life, has called the Universal
Declaration of the Rights of Nature. Animal Welfare, plant culture, organic
and inorganic chemistry of existence find fulfillment only when everyone is conscientised into acceptance of the Universal Declaration of the Rights of
Nature. This declaration was drafted by Prof. Georges Heuse (Belgium),
President of the World Foundation for the Quality of Life (University of
Ghent), author of the Universal Declaration of the Rights of Animals (1972)
and proclaimed on 15th October, 1978 at UNESCO. I advocate the
adoption of this declaration by Bharat of the Buddha and Gandhi and inspire
humanity world-wide to attain harmony with everything everywhere.
Mobilise
peoples’ compassion to activise animal welfare legislation
The universality of divinity is a fundamental faith of
Indian humanity rooted in the Rig Veda and manifest in the spiritual core of
all religions. “The ancients have stated that God sleeps in the mineral,
awakens in the vegetable, walks in the animal and thinks in man”. The unity
that runs thro’ Creation is thus a basic truth. Nature has thus an integral
relation with
animalia and
homo sapiens is an in severable
part of the evolutionary spiral, the highest peak of ecological ascent. The
ecological and environmental preservation is vital for life to survive on
earth. These great values are reflected in our constitution, a rare good
fortune and a binding recognition. The State and the citizen are duty bound
to promote and preserve ecology and environment as mandated by Articles 48A
and 51A.
Justice to animal citizens is as basic to humanism as
social justice is to an exploited people. You are no true Hindu, Jain,
Parsi, Christion or Muslim if you do not accept the indivisible unity of Creation
and the power of the invisible Creator. So it is that love of animals, in
the widest connotation, is integral to the divine vision. Be you secular or spiritural ecological fundamentals compel us to a compassionate relationship
with our sub human brethren. Here, indeed, is the starting point of the
deeper awareness of the harmony of Nature, Karuna and Ahimsa as apart of our
cultural heritage.
The philosophical perspective of Animal Welfare is thus
part parcel of our cultural heritage. Every time cruelty is practiced on man
or beast or bird or insect, we do violence to the Buddha and
Mahavira. Every
torture on an animal and every export of animals is a sin to the memory of
the founders of Bharatiya Sanskar.
Rukmini Devi, that gracious lady who symbolized
kindness to animals in her person, moved Jawaharlal Nehru to pass a
legislation and thus we have today the Prevention of cruelty to Animals Act,
1960.
Laws are decorative pieces on the Statute Book unless
there are powerful movements supportive of their provisions. The anatomy of
the 1960 Act has powers and, functions and infrastructure and has the
funding and control of the Government. Cruelty to animals is an offence and
experimentation on animals is regulated but not abolished. Performing animal
in circuses and otherwise for exhibition imply torture and so the Act has
provisions for policing such performances and exhibitions with view to
prevent cruelty. With all this and one or two later amendments, cruel
practices are continuing in the land where the cow is sacred, compassion is
a constitutional duty but torture some entertainment, bleeding , butchery,
animal sacrifice and other forms of cruelty are still extant. Sans people’s
movement, cruelty to animals will never, cease.
Now that the western winds are blowing and the
consumerist craze is growing, there is anew peril to our animal brethren.
For instance:
“The fur industry wages war on wildlife, the
lucrative leather market bolsters the cattle industry, and wool comes from
sheep who suffer unanaesthetized tooth grinding, tail cutting and unskilled
shearing. Angora is made from the hair of rabbits bred for a fast –growing
intensive confinement industry.
By choosing products made with canvas, cotton,
nylon, acrylic and other materials, we can clothe ourselves beautifully
without endorsing cruelty.
The more we realize that animals have real lives
like our own, the more courage we have to inform others. Most people prefer
not to be associated with animal suffering, but may not know the facts. Our
silence must not contribute to their ignorance.”
IS THERE A
SOLUTION?
Governments must be pressurized to do the right thing
lest India’s image and cultural heritage suffer severe damage. Let us not
betray the generations from the Buddha to Gandhi. Our tryst with destiny,
made when India awoke to Independence, included an imperative that the
nation will wipe every tear from every eye’. This applies to our animal
brethren, parrots, doves and other birds with broken wings to be sold as
pets or for delicate dish, lions and tigers cramped and doped in small cages
and even elephants and bears brutally treated to perform impossible feats.
Let us begin the crusade for compassion and we must win because our case is
just.
“DARWIN TAUGHT US NOT THAT ALL MEN
WERE MONKEYS ONCE, BUT THAT SOME MONKEYS HAVE NO TAILS NOW.”
–George Bernard Shaw.
(Excerpted from
Random Reflections by Justice V.R.Krishna Iyer, Universal, ed. 2003.)
Courtesy:
LAWYERS UPDATE- JULY 2005
Disease and life
Disease is a fact of life. Ofcourse, the definition of
disease depends on the point of view. To human beings, tuberculosis is a
disease. But to the tubercle bacillus, human beings are a habitat and life
source. Similarly, the earth is a habitat and life source for human beings.
But to the earth, human habitation is a disease, and human beings are arch
parasites. To the pristine earth, the coming of Homo sapiens signaled the
onset of a chronic, global illness, the outcome of which is still in doubt.
-From My Armchair :W.W. Armistead
[Dr. Willis W. Armistead of Knoxville, Tenn., a former American
Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) president, died April 18, 2006, at the
age of 89. Retired in 1987 as emeritus vice president of the University of
Tennessee, he was the founding dean of the UT College of Veterinary Medicine
and, before that, dean of the veterinary colleges at Texas A&M (1953-1957)
and Michigan State (1957-1974) universities.]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Editorial-Animal Crusaders July 2009 (quarterly
newsletter-print version)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WHO declares swine flu
pandemic
11
Jun 2009, 2041 hrs IST, AGENCIES
GENEVA: The World Health
Organization told its member nations it was declaring a swine flu pandemic
on Thursday - the first global flu epidemic in 41 years - as infections
climbed in the United States, Europe, Australia, South America and
elsewhere.
In a statement sent to
member countries, WHO said it decided to raise the pandemic warning level
from phase 5 to 6 - its highest alert - after holding an emergency meeting
on swine flu with its experts.
Paris: Discussions at
the OIE meeting
June
14, 2009 : 3:16 AM
Egypt: Pigs still being
killed
We have received two
recent reports related to the killing of pigs in Egypt, as a consequence of
the H1N1 epidemic. The first report indicates that significant discussions
took place in Paris at the OIE meeting in May and that positive steps are
being taken. However, it appears that pigs are still being killed, on the
ground, in Egypt
[http://network.bestfriends.org/egypt/news/34742.html]
Contents of a speech given by Debasis Chakrabarti on 28.12.1999 at the Banga
Sammelan -
conference on ‘Medicine In The Millennium’. Science City, Calcutta.
Subject: Zoonotic Diseases And The Indian Economy.
I have here, a collage of
headlines. I will read out a few........
New York, February 28th,
1997 :
Pig
virus can infect humans.
London,
July 23rd, 1996:
Mad
sheep scare sparks ban on offal in Britain.
London,
Nov, 26th, 1996:
Mad
cow disease may kill hundreds yearly-U.K.Study.
Gandhinagar, Aug 27th. 1997:
Rat-borne infection hits 16,000 in Gujarat.
Calcutta. April 26th, 1997 :
Doctors warn of dysentery from diseased fish.
Hong
Kong, Jan 10th,1998 :
HK
ducks infected by virus similar to chicken flu.
Tokyo,
June 5th, 1999 :
Japan will monitor all milk, beef imports.
The
Hague, Feb 18th, 1997 :
Swine fever scare hits Dutch officials.
Washington, Feb 10th, 1998:
Vaccine against deadly E. coli bacteria tested on volunteers.
London,
June 5th, 1999:
Britain bans. Belgian Pork, eggs, beef and poultry.
And,
Americans want industry to team with NGOs
[Financial Express, Calcutta, December 27th, 1999]
With due apologies to the
experts, it is my contention that far too little attention is paid to the
root cause of zoonotic diseases and their effect upon the socio-economic
progress of a society. Particularly in India, which is still very much a
developing country, we can ill afford the enormous expenditure of curative
medication, much of which needs to be imported. Curative medication is
frequently beyond the reach of the overwhelming majority of the Indian
population.
Not all the advances of
science can replace basics. Large-scale slaughter of diseased animals is no
guarantee of avoiding future outbreaks. Nor does compensation provide
farmers with alternate employment. Of what use are mechanization,
computerization & education if there are no jobs available? Even if jobs are
available, can the poor half educated villagers avail of them? Further, what
are the chances that a mentally underdeveloped person can hold the job? What
are the chances that a baby born to a mother who is undernourished, will be
intelligent and healthy? Worse, if the mother suffers from worm infestation
or chronic enteric disease?
It is imperative that we
not only analyze, but also act immediately and effectively, to curtail the
cause of so much human and animal suffering. India’s economy, at the very
grass root level, is still related to its livestock - both land and marine.
In our populous agro-based economy, it is important that every able-bodied
individual is productive. The economy doesn’t relate only to the per capita
income, but also to the constructive involvement of the people.
Self-employment is a very important economic factor in a populous country
like India. Hence, animals have a big role to play viz a viz the
rural population. It is equally important that the animals they use in their
daily lives are healthy and able. Thus, the health and well-being of both
the people and the animals are intricately linked. Like any other tropical
country, most of the endemic diseases here are of a zoonotic nature. Some of
the common zoonotic diseases are encephalitis, rabies, plague, brucellosis,
anthrax and salmonellosis. The only solution offered is mass slaughter of
diseased or suspected animals. Skin infections and worm infestation are also
very common and easily avoidable.
The practical, emotional
and economical impact of ill-health can’t be calculated. The benefits will
be enormous, if animal health is attended to. Governments are notoriously
slow in changing policies. This is why progress is slow, too ; and this is
why it becomes all the more important that NGOs and individuals take the
lead. We have to realize that animal welfare is an essential factor in
social welfare and that we neglect it at our peril.
Health care management of
the masses is dismal in most developing countries, including India. This
comprises of:
[a] awareness of the
disease
[h] preventive measures by
the State
[cj curative facilities
for the people
Resources invested in
increasing the awareness of disease and enhancing preventive measures would
be far more effective in controlling the diseases, at the same time managing
the Slate expenditure on health in a more economical way.
Take, for instance,
RABIES. It takes one injection, costing Rs.25/-to be given annually to the
dog. Post bite treatment, on the other hand, is anything North of Rs.
1,0007- for humans. Remember, one rabid dog bites a number of people before
it dies.
According to Dr. Wasi of
Bangkok’s Siriraj hospital, “people don’t get excited about rabies. It’s
just not a hot issue. There is so much money for AIDS, but very little for
rabies. Rabies is a fatal disease which can be prevented, but answer to the
AIDS epidemic is still a long way off ”. Dr.M.K. Sudarshan of Bangalore
represented India at the 1993 conference on rabies at Jakarta. He said that
the WHO figures stated, that of the 70,000 people dying annually of rabies,
30,000 were in India. These statistics have been taken from isolation
hospitals, whereas the real figure could be many times higher.
A month or so ago, there
was an outbreak of encephalitis in Andhra Pradesh. A good number of children
were killed and survivors were left with irreversible brain damage. Pigs
were slaughtered en masse, when it was established that they were the
responsible carriers. This, in a state which prides itself on technical
development; so much so, that their Chief Minister is fondly called ‘Cyber
Naidu1! We all know that mosquitoes do not breed on the backs of pigs - they
need filthy water holes or choked drains to breed. People keeping pigs must
be made aware of the need to observe basic cleanliness & sanitation in the
piggery. The carriers were slaughtered without attacking the root cause of
infection. Is this not a fallacy? And remember, killing animals is a costly
exercise; a total waste of available resources.
Once the diseases spread,
and people are ill, the amount spent on medication is much higher than cost
of increasing awareness and adopting preventive measures. Some of the
medicines are not manufactured domestically, making the treatment very
expensive. These resources could be invested more productively by the state
in other areas of the state economy and development. At present, villagers
are totally unaware even of vaccination or de-worming schedules. They bathe
in - and drink from the same ponds as do the cattle, pigs, goats, etc.
Several die due to rabies, encephalitis, plague, etc. Others fade away due
to enteric diseases, or continue to suffer from chronic skin infections. A
minor ailment frequently turns into a fatal problem due to lack of simple
treatment. Illness results in loss of man-days which results in lower
production, and hence-lower income; although their expenses go up due to the
need for treatment.
The world woke up lo the
danger of ecological imbalance and environmental disaster only when we
realized that we are on (he verge of destroying ourselves. In just a few
decades of mindless greed, we have destroyed what il took Nature millions of
years to build up. Isn’t it time we woke up to the truth that prevention is
better than cure ?!
"Animal
crusaders are not terrorists"
By Dirk Boon
in a Dutch Newspaper "Trouw" on october 22, 2003
In Boon’s opinion, crusading goes too far where violence against people and
“great destruction” is concerned. But he does understand the radicalisation
on the part of champions of animal rights. “When frustration becomes so high
a McDonalds can go up in flames. I can understand that.”Boon knows a number
of radical crusaders.’ “they are all well-meaning young men.”
In the professor’s view, the animal rights movement is no different to other
freedom movements .“I mean here abortion, euthanasia, nuclear power, the
right to strike. Each time there is a strong call for political
intervention, it is about choices of principle. It leads to struggle which
goes on for decades. “
Since the Seventies, Dirk Boon (54), has been concerned with the Legal
position of animals. He graduated and obtained a doctorate on the subject.
Since 1997, he is professor in Utrecht two days a week. To his dismay, Boon
is to date the only lawyer in The Netherlands who is specialised in animal
rights. “During the Eighties I hoped that many would follow me after my
doctorate. That animal rights would develop to become a discipline in
itself. Although that has occurred in the case of environmental rights,
animal rights have remained behind. “
And where Boon remained alone in the academic world, the extraparliamentary
champions of animal rights remained voices calling in the wilderness. Boon:
“no progress whatsoever has been made. A number of distressing things are
happening to animals, such as factory farming.” 130 million animals are kept
in factory farming. They live in abominable circumstances. In the course of
the last thirty years attention has been sought for this problem, to no
avail.
The fact they are never heard leads to enormous frustration for some people.
They see animals as their fellow creatures. Cropped up anger drives them
over the limit: they break windows, visit a breeding farm. But is that a
crime? It is a totally different category to knife fighters and drug
smugglers. I can sympathise with these people. There are limits to what you
can do to animals. “These lie, for example, by use of laboratory animals. I
am not amazed that many people are appalled by this. The 7,000 people in our
country concerned with the 700,000 laboratory animals we use each year are
not giving any information away. It is almost impossible to ascertain how
animal experiments are carried out and why. Their argument: ‘We have no
desire to expose ourselves to terror’”.
,,The same applies to livestock farming. In this sector 130 million animals
are kept, but when driving through The Dutch countryside, you see no
evidence of it. Livestock farmers have made themselves invisible. Nobody is
allowed in the stables because of danger of infection. They say: ‘the
consumer wants affordable meat, and the consumer wants animal-friendly
products and less disease among animals.’’ Without openness, these two
parties become incredibly angry with each other”.
Boon considers the breakdown in communication to have disastrous
consequences. “Radicalisation automatically comes about in this way. But it
would be going too far to call it fundamentalism. Although Volkert van der
G. has become the epitome of all that is evil, his way of working for
Environment Offensive (Milieu Offensief) demands respect. In his short
career he started 1200 legal proceedings, of which he won 90. He made no
friends with local and provincial authorities in this way, but they had made
a mess of it themselves.”
Animal crusaders are not terrorists.
Violence by protestors is accepted by the community as an unpleasant fact.
And football hooligans do not have to pay for the damage they bring about.
But damage done by animal crusaders is suddenly labeled “terrorist”.
Animal crusading is not terrorism. The Grote van Dale dictionary describes
terrorism thus: ‘committing violence (individual or collective attacks,
kidnapping, destruction) in order to demoralise the population and so to
attain a political goal’. In the modern sense of the word, terrorism mainly
means undermining democracy. There can be no talk of this in the case of
animal crusading.
I have done research into social and political actions after the Second
World War. Many of these actions are accompanied by destruction. Football
hooliganism is a good example. The Ajax bus was recently set on fire. I
don’t need to elaborate on the damage done by the squatters movement. I
remember distinctly the state of siege which was the order of the day in
Amsterdam during the Provo- period. Rows, rebellion, crusading, protests,
all social and political offshoots. Destruction in Rome during the European
Convention. Destruction in other parts of the World during World
consultation about globalisation.
If the majority of Parliament judges animal crusaders to be terrorists, as
became obvious recently, then I can only conclude that football hooligans
and other rebels must also be included in this category.
Fact is that in the past, no hard measures were taken against all forms of
vandalism. If supporters demolish the same football train every weekend, why
do these hooligans not have to pay for the damage? If hooliganism requires
inset of so many policeman on Sundays, why does the football club concerned
not have to pay for the extra police activities? That doesn’t happen – at
least not in my opinion – and still animal crusaders should be charged and
treated as terrorists?
In a communication (Podium, 7 October), the VVD-member of Parliament,
Anouchka van Miltenburg, awakes the impression that I approve of violence
arising from social frustration. That is certainly not the case. She refers
to an interview with me in Trouw (3 October) but the first lines of that
interview state: no violence and little destruction. I do not close my eyes,
however, to the fact that many protests are accompanied by destruction and
violence. Such actions seem to be acceptable, provided they are conducted
with moderation and everyone seems to turn a blind eye to the material
damage. I have never heard of the violators of commemorative monuments being
followed and charged. The same applies to the Moroccan youths who recently
left a trail of destruction throughout Amsterdam-West immediately following
the commemoration of a Moroccan boy who had been shot and killed by a
policeman. In this society, this sort of destruction is obviously tolerated
by police and the Pub
lic Prosecutor. It is just a fact of life. Nobody gets upset at the fact
that the independent tobacconist is not compensated by his insurance company
for damage and that he is too afraid – for fear of repercussions – to claim
the costs of the damage from the perpetrators. We clearly need to be brave
and carry the costs of material damage ourselves
Many social questions are solved eventually. That can take a year and
sometimes much longer. There has never been an adequate solution found for
football hooliganism which has been around since the Seventies.
Animal welfare problems have increased both in quality and numbers during
the last forty years. In the Netherlands 150 million animals are kept,
almost ten per member of the population. For far and away most of these
animals, their welfare leaves much to be desired. The main problems lie in
farming of production animals, which counts some 125 million at this point
in time. Factory farming should be seen as a dead-end street. It has
provided the farmers concerned no lasting, economic position, the landscape
has been destroyed, the problem with manure is as large as ever, animal
fodder needs to be imported from countries far abroad, which has been
produced on a surface six times as large as the Dutch agricultural acreage,
and animal welfare remains as poor as ever. There is constant tension
between producers and consumers, and at the same everyone has had enough of
the breakout and combating of infectious diseases in animals in recent
years.
Most people are fed up of this situation. In their houses, however, 800,000
thoroughbred dogs are to be found, the majority of whom are afflicted with
serious hereditary abnormalities. Painful defects which make them sick. And
then there are all those people who are concerned about the fate of the
700,000 laboratory animals used annually in The Netherlands and about the
state of the environment.
Via my University Chair, I am often approached by people who are emotionally
totally distressed at the conditions in which so many groups of animals are
kept in our society. I myself am not lead by these sentiments, but I
recognize very well the frustration in various layers of society. The
‘human-animal question” has only increased during the last forty years and
to a certain extent I can understand how so many people have become
frustrated at the many problems occurring with animals. If aggression arises
and is released at the loss of a football match or other such trivial
matter, then I am certainly not surprised that material damage is caused
during crusades by seriously frustrated animal lovers. Let me put it more
strongly: I am surprised that these actions are so small-scaled and only
take place incidentally. If the Parliament Building should be stormed
tomorrow and held under siege for considerable time by animal crusaders, it
would not surprise me at all. Please
note: I do not approve of this, I am only registering and while doing so I
note that so much aggression is accepted in our society as being
self-evident.
The term 'terrorists' should be reserved for people and groups of people who
attempt to undermine Democracy and her culture by means of destruction and
violence. In our society, besides, various forms of violence and destruction
are to be seen, conducted individually or in an organized manner, which need
to be settled within the normal framework of criminal justice. This also
includes animal crusading.
[Since the Seventies, Dirk Boon (54), has been concerned with the Legal
position of animals. He graduated and obtained a doctorate on the subject.
Since 1997, he was professor Animal Rights at the University of Utrecht, the
Netherlands.]
Court
buoys rabies-free city initiative
A STAFF REPORTER ( The TELEGRAPH,
KOLKATA March 2 , 2004 )
|
|
|
It
was unnecessary to speak about the laws, since the Customs and Excise
people new them fully well. It was futile to repeat the impressive facts
and figures dwelt upon by Mr.Biswajit Mohanty of the Wildlife Society of
Orissa. What people need everywhere is motivation, and this is the theme
chosen by Mr.Debasis Chakrabarti in his hour-long speech.
He began quoting H.G.Wells (The Time
Machine) who wrote that the world has progressed from agriculture to
paradox. The paradox is that although we have made a substantial amount of
progress in information and technology, we still face the problems of
insufficiency. This is the result of both uncontrolled overpopulation, and
uncontrolled greed. As Mahatma Gandhi put it, "There is enough for
every man’s need, but not for every man’s greed."
Debasis spoke informally and extempore,
to the 65+ group of officers and employees, on a one to one basis. He
pointed how greed was a very natural component of human nature, and
accepted that it is difficult to hold on to values and suffer
economically, especially when one sees others give in to temptation and
flourish. He suggested that if greed there be, let it be for the luxury of
knowing that one had the strength to resist a temptation which would have
done incalculable damage to future generations. In this day and age, job
satisfaction is a rare commodity, and at the end of the day, frustration
and guilt erase the elation of outward appearances. There are
comparatively innocuous items, and there are items which cannot be
condoned by any allurement. The damage to the ecology, caused by the
illegal trade in wildlife, is irreversible. The hype created by scientists
lead the less informed to believe that cloning is the answer to every
problem. This fallacy compounds the damage to our environment, since
people tend to take environmental issues more lightly. Nature took ages to
develop her own balance. Mankind has brought it to a level where the
fragile balance can be wrecked any time. A cloned tiger, for instance, can
never contribute to the ecology once the tigers created by nature are
extinct.
Debasis made a few down to earth
suggestions. One of these was that posters be put up at Airports, to alert
uninformed couriers, and criminals, of the banned items. Another was a
mention, on the immigration/ disembarkation forms, that the passenger is
not carrying any of these contraband items. Yet another was to release the
poacher with a warning, provided he gives a lead to the next in the chain
of the traffickers.
Debasis also emphasized upon the need to
avoid inter-departmental feuds, and the urge to take credit. He lauded the
Government for placing wildlife crimes under the CBI, so that a
centralized information bank could get inputs from all the different
agencies involved in the matter and also from the public who prefer to
avoid revealing themselves. The fact that – after Mrs. Indira Gandhi –
Mr.Atal Behari Bajpayi was the first Prime Minister of India to take up
the issue seriously was significant and encouraging. Since this subject
was finally receiving the importance it deserves, at the highest levels,
it was obvious that everyone in the department would also have to give it
due importance. That being the case, it was up to the individual. "I
plead with you, with folded hands" he pleaded emotionally, "
think about the affect of your action. Think about your grandchildren, and
their children. Think about all the unborn future generations which are
– literally – dependent upon your choice, for their health and even
existence."
Debasis pointed out the need to stop
thinking about state our national boundaries, because the issue had a
global effect, and the damage had to be controlled at base; where the
animals and birds lived, where they were caught and killed; not just at
the International borders after the damage was done. He told them about
the crisis in U.P.’s Rajaji Park, where flying insects were destroying
7,00,000 sal trees. Tribals had to be employed to kill these insects and
save the forest area. This was the result of poaching of indigenous birds
who had eaten these insects and controlled their population. This was just
one example of some seemingly immaterial activity harmed us all.
"The next war will not be over fuel,
nor over religion," Debasis warned. "It will be over water.
Pure, drinking water, for which there is no substitute, and which cannot
be manufactured by all our advance in science and technology,
computerization or space exploration. It is time we place our feet solidly
on the ground and prepare to face the grim consequences, unless we are
prepared to sacrifice immediate, petty gain and comfort for long-term,
essential benefits, and survival itself, for the entire human race."
THE TELEGRAPH
Thursday, February 27, 2003
NGOs called in to help save wildlife
SUBHRO SAHA
Can a cloned tiger contribute to ecology?
How can thousands of sal trees be saved from flying insects whose
population has spun out of control, thanks to rampant poaching of
indigenous birds? How does one save the Olive Ridley and Gangetic turtles?
In a significant move to curb illegal
trafficking in wildlife and boost conservation efforts, the Central
government has involved the expertise of NGOs working in the field
"for the first time", and a city-based activist body figures
among those called to "share their experience" to bolster the
knowledge base. Compassionate
Crusaders Trust (CCT), a Calcutta NGO working on animal rights and
wildlife protection, was invited to an awareness workshop organised by the
chief commissioner of central excise and customs, Bhubaneswar, on the ‘Role
of central excise & customs officers in the conservation of wildlife’.
Held in the Orissa capital on Central Excise Day (February 24), the
workshop was attended by more than 160 customs and central excise
officers. "It’s a significant
leap forward to involve speciality groups and this effort can only improve
motivation levels," said Debasis Chakraborti, CCT founder, who did a
presentation at the first-of-its-kind workshop. Biswajeet
Mohanty from Wild Life Society of Orissa was the other expert to speak at
the interface, inaugurated by chief commissioner of central excise &
customs, Bhubaneswar, Sujoy Roy. "This
is not a mere endeavour to pursue love for animals, but an effort to
preserve our own natural resources," Roy told the participants.
Dwelling on the menace of illegal traffic in wildlife products, he
stressed on the need to "control the damage at the base", where
the animals and birds are captured and killed, "and not just at
international borders". CCT,
which received the Venu Menon Award last year for its work in curtailing
cattle-smuggling across the Bangladesh border, expressed concern at the
increasing traffic of Gangetic turtles into Bangladesh through the state’s
"porous" borders. "The turtles, sold clandestinely in
markets across West Bengal, constitute only about five per cent of the
total catch. The rest are smuggled into Bangladesh, where it’s not a
protected species and consumption of its meat is legal," said
Chakraborti. The CCT suggested that
posters be put up at airports to alert uninformed couriers of banned
items, or a mention made on the immigration/disembarkation forms that the
passenger is not carrying contraband stuff. The
NGO lauded the Centre for placing wildlife crimes under the CBI, so that a
centralised information bank could get inputs from all the agencies
involved, and also from the public, protecting their identity.
|